Pablo Picasso’s name is virtually synonymous with modern art, but his genius didn’t come from a rejection of tradition. Quite the opposite: he absorbed the past—its techniques, styles, motifs, and myths—and then fractured, reassembled, and reinvented them to create something entirely new. His work is a conversation across centuries, blending the classical with the revolutionary. Through this fusion, Picasso didn’t just make great art—he changed the way art speaks.
This blog takes an in-depth look at how Picasso used historical art forms, techniques, and concepts as raw material to forge a groundbreaking visual language that continues to shape art today.
Though Picasso is remembered for radical abstraction, his artistic roots were firmly planted in tradition. Born in Málaga in 1881, he was a prodigious talent from a young age. By the time he was 14, he was already more technically skilled than most of his teachers at the Real Academia de Bellas Artes in Barcelona.
Early works such as The First Communion (1896) and Portrait of Aunt Pepa (1896) display an academic mastery of form, proportion, and realism—hallmarks of Renaissance and classical European art. Picasso devoured the lessons of the Old Masters: El Greco’s elongated figures, Velázquez’s courtly realism, Goya’s psychological depth. These influences formed a bedrock that would allow him to deconstruct visual norms with confidence and authority.
A pivotal shift came in the early 1900s, when Picasso encountered Iberian sculpture at the Louvre and later African tribal masks at the ethnographic museum in Paris. These non-Western sources, often dismissed as “primitive” by European critics of the time, struck Picasso as raw, spiritual, and formally powerful.
This moment exploded into one of the most influential paintings of the 20th century: Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (1907). A fusion of classical nudes and African mask forms, the painting shattered Renaissance perspective, flattened space, and introduced a new, jagged visual vocabulary.
At a time when European painting prized polish and illusionism, Picasso’s invocation of African and Iberian art challenged the primacy of Western ideals. He didn’t copy these traditions—he used their forms as symbols of psychic power and alternative modes of seeing.
Cubism, co-developed with Georges Braque, is Picasso’s most revolutionary achievement—and the clearest example of how he used historical techniques to disrupt visual norms. Renaissance artists like Leonardo and Raphael developed single-point perspective to simulate three-dimensional space. Picasso flipped that on its head.
In works like Ma Jolie (1911–12) and Still Life with Chair Caning (1912), Picasso dismantles the illusion of depth. Objects are shown from multiple angles at once, collapsing time and viewpoint into a single, abstracted surface. Yet even here, he draws on tradition—Cubism echoes the spatial puzzles of Cézanne and the structured compositions of Poussin.
Picasso also revived trompe-l'œil—a technique from Baroque painting that mimics real-world textures—but reimagined it through collage. By gluing oilcloth, wallpaper, and newspaper into his canvases, he invented a new kind of pictorial space that fused the real and the imagined.
Throughout his life, Picasso returned to Greco-Roman mythology as a narrative wellspring. In the 1930s and 40s, as Europe plunged into fascism and war, these ancient stories took on new urgency.
His 1936 series of Minotaur etchings blends classical myth with personal symbolism. The Minotaur—a half-man, half-bull creature—is both violent and vulnerable, a metaphor for the artist and for the modern condition. In works like Minotaur Blindfolded Leading a Little Girl, Picasso fuses myth with surrealism and classical draftsmanship.
In later years, he returned to the theme of the artist in the studio, casting himself as a modern-day painter-sage in dialogue with the muses of antiquity. His 1957 series of interpretations of Las Meninas, originally by Velázquez, is another example: here, Picasso reworks a classical masterpiece into dozens of variations, pulling its composition apart and reassembling it through a Cubist lens.
Picasso’s genius wasn’t confined to canvas. His printmaking and ceramics practice—inspired by centuries of European artisanship—reflect his deep engagement with tradition and his drive to push it forward.
In printmaking, he explored etching, aquatint, lithography, linocut, and sugar-lift techniques with master printers like Roger Lacourière and Hidalgo Arnéra. While 18th- and 19th-century artists like Goya and Delacroix used these techniques for narrative realism, Picasso employed them to explore abstraction, eroticism, and symbolic transformation.
His ceramics, created at the Madoura pottery studio in Vallauris, reimagined ancient Greek vases, Iberian amphorae, and traditional southern French motifs. He decorated plates with bulls, owls, and human faces, combining playful imagery with mythic resonance.
In Guernica (1937), Picasso synthesized centuries of European history painting into a singular cry of anguish. Painted in response to the fascist bombing of the Spanish town of Guernica, the mural references multiple traditions: the grandeur of Baroque composition, the moral gravity of Goya’s Disasters of War, and the narrative clarity of medieval altarpieces.
Rendered entirely in grisaille (shades of grey), Guernica evokes the solemnity of classical sculpture and the monochrome immediacy of newspaper imagery. The figures—screaming mothers, fallen soldiers, gored horses—draw on traditional Christian iconography but are transformed into modern archetypes of suffering.
This is not a historical painting in the traditional sense—it is history reimagined as myth, symbol, and allegory. It is timeless, yet urgent.
In his later years, Picasso embarked on a series of interpretations of canonical works by artists like Delacroix (Women of Algiers), Manet (Luncheon on the Grass), and Rembrandt (The Prodigal Son). These were not homages—they were acts of transformation.
Rather than copying, Picasso deconstructed these masterpieces, filtering them through the lens of Cubism, surrealism, and expressionism. He expanded, cropped, reinterpreted, and recontextualized—bringing the past into fierce dialogue with the present.
His late works are bold, often grotesque, filled with color and urgency. They show an artist wrestling with mortality and legacy—asking not just what art has been, but what it could become.
Picasso didn’t abandon tradition—he cannibalized it, metabolized it, and turned it into something unrecognizable and new. His genius lies in his ability to treat the history of art not as a museum of relics but as a living language. Every style, symbol, and technique was a tool, and he used them all to speak the truths of his own time.
Whether borrowing from Greek myth, Renaissance composition, African sculpture, or Spanish baroque drama, Picasso wove a tapestry of references that transcended culture and chronology. He proved that innovation doesn’t mean erasure. It means transformation.
In today’s art world—where boundaries blur between fine art and craft, where past and present constantly collide—Picasso’s approach feels more relevant than ever. His work invites us to look back not with nostalgia, but with possibility. To see tradition not as a constraint, but as a launchpad.
Because to create the future of art, Picasso taught us, you must first break open the past.
Discover original Picasso prints for sale and contact our teams for current availabilities.
